Recent Articles



































2001 anthrax attack



         


The 2001 anthrax attacks occurred over several weeks in September and October 2001. Cases of anthrax due to bioterrorism broke out at various locations. Due to the fact that this immediately followed the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks there has been speculation of linkage between the two events. It is alleged that a "skin lesion" found on Ahmed al-Haznawi, one of the September 11 hijackers who sought treatment at Holy Cross Hospital in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, was cutaneous anthrax. However, two sets of anthrax letters were mailed after the suicidal attacks on 911. It is difficult to see how the hijackers were responsible for the anthrax attacks unless they had surviving comrads who continued their terrorist campaign.

The first set of anthrax letters are believed to have been mailed from Trenton NJ on September 18, 2001, exactly one week from the attacks on 911. Five letters are thought to have been mailed at this time and addressed to media outlets, mostly in the New York City area. The recipients of these letters were ABC News, CBS News, NBC News, and the New York Post--all located in New York City. The other letter believed to have been mailed around this time was addressed to The National Enquirer's old mailing address and later forwarded to their new offices at American Media Inc. in Florida. AMI also publishes the tabloid Sun where one of the anthrax victims, Robert Stevens, died. A note was found in the New York Post letter which read, "09-11-01, THIS IS NEXT, TAKE PENACILIN NOW, DEATH TO AMERICA, DEATH TO ISRAEL, ALLAH IS GREAT." Some believe this note represented a benign form of bio-terrorism since medical advice was included in the letter: "take penacilin now." It has been suggested the mailer of the New York media anthrax really did not want to harm anyone. A more convincing argument points to the fact that the anthrax in the New York media letters could have caused only skin infections, cutaneous anthrax, and not death. In contrast, the second batch of anthrax letters were mailed three weeks later on October 9 from Trenton NJ and addressed to two Democrat Senators in Washington DC. The two letters had identical notes which read, "09-11-01, YOU CAN NOT STOP US. WE HAVE THIS ANTHRAX. YOU DIE NOW. ARE YOU AFRAID? DEATH TO AMERICA. DEATH TO ISRAEL. ALLAH IS GREAT." These anthrax letters addresed to the Seante certainly were designed to cause harm. Within them was a modern "weaponized" form of anthrax; until now unseen by bioweapons experts.

There were numerous exposures and 22 actual infections, including five fatalities. Thousands were tested. 10,000 people in the United States took a two-month course of antibiotics after possible exposure. Hundreds or thousands of unexposed persons acquired the antibiotic Cipro through their doctors or over the Internet. Later statistical analysis claims that approximately 5 deaths and 25 non-fatal cases of anthrax were prevented by prompt antibiotic use.

The letters did not contain the same type of anthrax. At least two different grades of anthrax material were sent in what is believed to be a total of seven letters. However, all of the letters were of the same strain. This strain, known as the Ames strain, is one that the U.S. military used for study at USAMRIID and distributed to at least fifteen bio-research labs within the US and six overseas. The FBI claims the anthrax attack was a form of domestic terrorism. It is unclear if the FBI is being honest in this assessment.

[Top]

List of related events

The State Department mail facility expects to begin decontamination in the summer of 2003.

[Top]

Anthrax scares, rumors, news

[Top]

Political impact

Although the physical impact of the event was small relative to other acts of war or terrorism, the political impact of these events was tremendous. Many states across the globe passed laws making hoaxes more serious crimes than they were previous to the attack. Attention focused on biowar and bioterrorism and other less active measures to promote biosecurity (e.g. toughened U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations to protect the United States supply of imported food from both accidental and human-introduced toxic substances). Also, research to identify genetically-modified bacteria (e.g. E. coli) with toxic genes (e.g. from the anthrax bacterium) introduced by human effort, was well underway by late 2002. This research would help identify a deliberate (versus accidental) attack more quickly. The slow and often confused response by U.S. government officials, who often contradicted themselves during the 2001 attacks, was in part due to a lack of clear answers about anthrax and its use as a weapon. Accordingly a great effort has focused on getting answers in advance of another attack, and anticipating vectors (such as genetically modified E. coli) which would be far less traceable to source than any mailed letter.

So far, no individual or group has been charged with the attacks themselves. The FBI has named former government scientist Steven Hatfill a "person of interest" but has not sought charges. Hatfill has maintained that he is innocent and sued the government for destroying his life. Many assume that since no other suspects have been identified or questioned, that Hatfill is the perpetrator, but that the FBI lacks the evidence to successfully prosecute him.

[Top]

See also

[Top]




  View Live Article   This article is from Wikipedia. All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License