Recent Articles



































Paradox



         


Paradox is also a product from Borland and Faction Paradox is a fictional group.


A paradox is an apparently true statement or group of statements that seems to lead to a contradiction or to a situation that defies intuition. The recognition of ambiguities, equivocations, and unstated assumptions underlying known paradoxes has often led to significant advances in science, philosophy and mathematics.

The etymology of paradox can be traced back to the early Renaissance. Early forms of the word appeared in the late Latin paradoxum and the related Greek paradoxon. The word is composed of the preposition para which means "by way of", or "according to" conjoined to the noun stem doxa, meaning "what is received." Compare orthodox (literally, "strait teaching") and heterodox (literally, "different teaching"). Thus a paradox is (theoretically) solvable given more information, while a contradiction (literally, "speak contrary") is (theoretically) insolvable on the basis of the information that has already been received. In common parlance the terms are sometimes used synonymously. The liar paradox and other paradoxes were studied in medieval times under the heading insolubilia.

Not all paradoxes are equal. For example, the Birthday paradox is more of a surprise than a paradox, while the resolution of Curry's paradox is still a matter of contention. Common themes in paradoxes include direct and indirect self-reference, infinity, circular definitions, and confusion of levels of reasoning. Paradoxes which are not based on a hidden error generally happen at the fringes of context or language, and require extending the context (or language) to lose their paradox quality.

In moral philosophy, paradox plays a particularly central role in debates on ethics. For instance, an ethical admonition to "love thy neighbor" is not just in contrast with, but in contradiction to an armed neighbor actively trying to kill you: if he or she succeeds, then, you will not be able to love them. But to preemptively attack them or restrain them is not usually understood as very loving. This might be termed an ethical dilemma. Another example is the conflict between an injunction not to steal and one to care for a family that you cannot afford to feed without stolen money.

[Top]

Types of paradoxes

W. V. Quine (1962) distinguished three classes of paradox:

[Top]

List of paradoxes

Not all paradoxes fit neatly into one category. Some paradoxes include:

[Top]

Veridical paradoxes

These are unintuitive results of correct logical reasoning.

[Top]

Mathematical/Logical

[Top]

Psychological/Philosophical

[Top]

Physical

[Top]

Falsidical paradoxes

These are incorrect results of subtly false reasoning.

[Top]

Antinomies

Paradoxes that show flaws in accepted reasoning, axioms, or definitions. Note that many of these are special cases, or adaptations, of Russell's paradox.

[Top]

Antinomies of definition

These paradoxes rest simply on an ambiguous definition.

[Top]

Conditional paradoxes

These are paradoxes only if certain special assumptions are made. Some of these show that those assumptions are false or incomplete; others are other types of paradoxes.

[Top]

Other paradoxes

[Top]

References

Quine, W. V. (1962) "Paradox". Scientific American, April 1962, pp. 84–96.

Michael Clarke. Paradoxes from A to Z. London: Routledge, 2002.

[Top]

See also

[Top]




  View Live Article   This article is from Wikipedia. All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License