Recent Articles



































Urban warfare



         


Urban warfare is warfare conducted in populated urban areas such as towns, cities and refugee camps. The US military term is MOUT, or Military Operations in/on Urban Terrain. The Canadian and British military term is FIBUA, or Fighting In Built Up Areas.

Warfare inside a city is very different from a traditional open field battle against a conventional army. A complicating factor of urban warfare is the presence of civilians, sometimes as combatants of various sorts, ranging from armed militias to people defending their homes against all comers, usually with many innocent non-combatants trying to stay out of the way of the battling forces. The military operations are also complicated by limited fields of view and fire because of buildings, large amounts of concealment and cover for defenders and the ease of placement of booby traps and snipers.

Traditional (World War II) military operations often rely on large quantities of artillery fire, which many modern armies will try to avoid as a way of reducing civilian casualties. A notable exception to this was the Russian attack on Grozny in which large amounts of artillery fire were used. The Russian army handled the issue of civilian casualities by warning that the city would be levelled and that any civilian should leave the city before the attack began.

Usually the weaker party in a war tries to enforce urban warfare on the attacking force. This is due to serveral reasons:

  1. A populated city is much harder to conquer than an open field. This is because an invading force must expend massive amounts of manpower to secure a myriad of structures without indescriminately bombing them.
  2. The urbanized city is much easier to defend because it has many tall buildings, narrow alleys and sewage tunnels. The buildings can provide excellent sniping posts while the alleys are ideal for planting booby traps.
  3. International law prohibits the use of heavy fire power and indiscriminate bombing in civilian-populated settings. Thus, the party barricading in a city won't have to face warplanes, heavy artillery and massive tank assault if it faces an army that cares to operate in a legal manner.
  4. "Media War": a war on urban terrain is bound to cause some civilian casualties and extreme damage to civilian property. Photos of dead civilians and ruined streets broadcast on TV make a strong impact in favor of the party barricading in the city and undermine the morale of the attacking force. (The Tet Offensive was a military victory for the American forces, but was somehow seen as a defeat due to post-battle news coverage.)

The limited fields of view require far larger numbers of troops than open field warfare and the operations are renowned for resulting in very high casualty rates among the attacking force's ranks. The US forces operating in Iraq in 2003 saw remarkably low personnel casualty rates, attributable to:

Civilian casualty rates, however, were much higher; an AP survey of records from half of Iraq's hospitals found that at least 3,240 civilians died between March 20th and April 20th during the US-led invasion. It should be noted that this number does not necessarily represent the total number of civilian lives lost to the invasion of Iraq as many bodies were not recovered.

Famous urban battles in modern time:

[Top]

See also:

[Top]

External links:






  View Live Article   This article is from Wikipedia. All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License