US governmental response to the September 11, 2001 attacks
Military response
The United States government has announced its intentions to engage in
a protracted war against terrorists and states which aid terrorists in response
to the attack. The first
target was the Taliban government in Afghanistan, because they did not turn over Osama bin
Laden (prime suspect). The Taliban alleged their inability to satisfy this request and demanded their right to examine the
evidence in which the United States government based its claims. This was denied and the United States government expressed its
unwillingness to enter into any discussion. Also, there were some early indications that Iraq may have been involved, but nothing
other than circumstantial evidence had been produced in the month following the attack. The United States has made it clear that
this "War on Terrorism" will continue after dealing with whoever is
responsible for the September 11 attack, but it is very unclear exactly what that means.
On September 19, 2001 the U.S. sent combat aircraft to Persian Gulf military bases.
There have been reports that U.S. and British special-forces soldiers were covertly landed in Afghanistan at some time after
September 11, presumably for reconnaissance purposes, and that several of these troops were captured by the Taliban. As of
October 1, all such reports had been officially denied by the U.S., British, and Afghani governments.
On October 7, at 12:30 PM EDT (9 PM local time), the United States, supported by Britain, began its attack on Afghanistan,
launching bombs and cruise missiles against Taliban military and communications facilities and suspected terrorist training
camps. See 2001 U.S. Attack on
Afghanistan.
Osama bin Laden warned Bush via satellite courtesy of Al-Jazeera, that if the US uses nuclear weapons, he might also use
biochemical/nuclear weapons in response.
In November of 2001, the Northern Alliance won Kabul, the capital of Afghanistan over the Taliban forcing them to flee in
Kandahar.
For following developments, see "War on Terrorism". And
for the article on associated policies such as pre-emption see Bush
Doctrine.
Domestic response
Investigations are going on through many branches of many governments, pursuing tens of thousands of tips. Hundreds of people
have being detained, arrested, and/or questioned so far. The Justice Department wishes to interview 5000 young men from the
Middle East. See detentions following the September 11, 2001 attack.
A $40 billion emergency bill has already been passed. A $20 billion bill to bail out the airline industry also passed.
USA PATRIOT Act passed.
On October 10, the FBI released its "FBI Most Wanted Terrorists" list.
See also
World Trade Center -- The Pentagon -- New York City -- Washington, D.C. -- AA Flight 11 -- UA Flight 75 -- AA Flight 77 -- UA
Flight 93 -- U.S. Department
of Defense -- Operation Bojinka -- terrorism -- domestic terrorism --
Osama bin Laden -- Taliban -- Afghanistan -- collective trauma -- racism -- September 11
External links
- TURF BATTLES: Conflicting Visions of How to Rebuild Lower Manhattan, New
York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/21/nyregion/21TURF.html), 9/21/2001
- briefing by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld (http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/20/national/20CND-RTXT.html), 9/19/2001
- THE MILITARY: Scarcity of Afghan Targets Leads U.S. to Revise
Strategy, New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/19/international/19MILI.html), 9/19/2001
- MILITARY ANALYSIS: A New War and Its Scale, New York Times
(http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/17/international/17ASSE.html), 9/17/2001
- THE WHITE HOUSE: Bush Warns of a Wrathful, Shadowy and Inventive War,
New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/17/national/17CAPI.html),
9/17/2001
- Broad New U.S. Strategy to Fight Terror Emerging, L.A.
Times (http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-091601strategy.story),
9/16/2001
- MILITARY ANALYSIS: U.S. Force vs. Terrorists: From Reactive to
Active, New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/14/international/14STRA.html), 9/14/2001
- NEWS ANALYSIS: No Middle Ground, New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/14/international/14ASSE.html), 9/14/2001
- MOBILIZATION: Rumsfeld Asks Call-Up of Reserves, as Many as 50,000,
New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/14/international/14MILI.html),
9/14/2001
- When
Journalists Report for Duty (http://www.fair.org/media-beat/010920.html),
9/20/2001
-This article has been brought to you by BambooWeb and Wikipedia-
